Skip to content
African Mining Market · 矿业新闻· Staff Writer·· 26 d agoAI score62.0

坦桑尼亚修法允许内阁批准的资源协议采用境外仲裁地

Cabinet approval allows non-Tanzanian jurisdiction in resource agreements

Public on this site

AI summary

坦桑尼亚《成文法(杂项修订)(第2号)法(2026年)》修订《自然财富与资源(永久主权)法》,新增第11条第4款,允许经内阁批准的资源协议约定境外仲裁地或非坦桑尼亚司法管辖。此前第11条自2017年起限制外国法院或仲裁庭管辖,被认为影响项目融资与可融资性。新条款并非普遍放开,未约定或未经内阁批准的协议仍适用原有限制,且特别安排的范围、内阁审批程序与是否可追溯批准等问题尚未明确。

Text · original

The Chinese translation is being made; the original is shown for now.

In a major development impacting investors, Tanzanian law now expressly allows a natural resources agreement to provide for a foreign seat of arbitration or non-Tanzanian jurisdiction, provided the Cabinet has approved the agreement. This development was introduced by the Written Laws (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 2) Act, 2026 (Act No. 7 of 2026) (Amendment Act), which amends the Natural Wealth and Resources (Permanent Sovereignty) Act, Cap. 449 (NWR Act).

Part VI of the Amendment Act (sections 18 and 19), which is to be read as one with the NWR Act, amends section 11 of the NWR Act by adding a new subsection (4).

The position before the amendment

Since 2017, section 11 of the NWR Act has provided that:

https://africanminingmarket.com/adtrack-delivery/27178 查看配图:SIREXE 2026

  • permanent sovereignty over natural wealth and resources shall not be the subject of proceedings in any foreign court or tribunal (section 11(1));
  • disputes arising from the extraction, exploitation or acquisition and use of natural wealth and resources shall be adjudicated by judicial bodies or other organs established in the United Republic and in accordance with the laws of Tanzania (section 11(2)); and
  • the applicable Tanzanian fora and Tanzanian law shall be acknowledged and incorporated into the relevant arrangement or agreement (section 11(3)).

These provisions were generally understood to restrict foreign-seated arbitration and non-Tanzanian jurisdiction in agreements within their scope. Such restrictions were viewed unfavourably by investors and financial institutions, as they adversely affected project financing and bankability.

By limiting investors’ ability to choose a more developed and established arbitral seat, with a well-developed arbitration framework, experienced supervisory courts and established jurisprudence on international arbitration.

As a result, in certain exceptional circumstances warranting the inclusion of a foreign seat of arbitration or a foreign jurisdiction in an agreement, the Government was amenable to and permitted such arrangements. However, investors lacked the additional assurance of an express legislative provision establishing a clear procedure for invoking such exceptions.

The latest amendment is therefore welcome, as it goes a step further in enhancing investor confidence by providing a legislative basis for investors to negotiate a seat of arbitration or jurisdiction with which they are more comfortable, while expressly recognising the circumstances in which an exception may be permitted.

Section 11(4) provides that:

‘Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, where an agreement provides for a special arrangement relating to proceedings, seat of arbitration or jurisdiction in disputes arising from extraction, exploitation or acquisition and use of natural wealth resources, and such agreement has been approved by the Cabinet, the application of the provisions of this section shall not prejudice the implementation of such agreement.’

Key implications

Natural Resources (Mining, Oil and Gas, etc)

  • Improved bankability and investor confidence: The amendment may make large-scale mining, oil and gas, concession and other long-term natural resources projects more bankable and attractive, particularly where sponsors, lenders, joint venture partners or other investors require internationally accepted dispute resolution arrangements.
  • Structuring and record-keeping: Cabinet approval is now key where parties intend to depart from the default position under section 11. The approval should be properly documented and kept as part of the transaction’s closing and regulatory record.
  • The exception is not automatic: The carve-out is not a general liberalisation. An agreement that is silent on seat or jurisdiction, or that the Cabinet has not approved, remains subject to sections 11(1) to 11(3).

Arbitration

  • Statutory basis for foreign-seated arbitration: Where its conditions are met, section 11(4) gives a clear statutory basis for a foreign seat of arbitration, despite the general restrictions in section 11.
  • Reduced enforcement risk: Because section 11 ‘shall not prejudice the implementation’ of a Cabinet-approved agreement, the amendment should strengthen the position of parties relying on a foreign-seated arbitration or jurisdiction clause and limit arguments that the clause is void or unenforceable as contrary to Tanzanian public policy.
  • Drafting of agreements: Dispute resolution clauses that depart from section 11 should expressly record the special arrangement and refer to the Cabinet approval, so that the agreement clearly falls within section 11(4).

Open questions

The Amendment Act leaves several important issues unresolved, including:

  • the meaning and scope of ‘special arrangement’;
  • the procedure, form, timing and evidential requirements for Cabinet approval;
  • whether Cabinet approval must be obtained before the agreement is signed or may be obtained subsequently; and
  • whether, and to what extent, section 11(4) applies to agreements entered into before 2 October 2026, including whether retrospective Cabinet approval is possible.

Practical considerations

  • Review dispute resolution clauses in existing and pipeline natural resources agreements against the new section 11(4).
  • Audit approval records to establish whether Cabinet approval exists and in what form.
  • For transactions under negotiation that contemplate a special dispute resolution arrangement, make Cabinet approval an express condition precedent and closing deliverable.

Recommendations

To mitigate risk and ensure compliance, investors, sponsors and lenders in Tanzania should:

  • Parties to existing agreements containing special arrangements relating to dispute resolution proceedings, the seat of arbitration or jurisdiction should consider seeking retrospective Cabinet approval for such arrangements, as a precautionary measure.

Evarist Kameja is a Senior Associate at Bowmans.

Choose the [African Mining Market] as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment on current mining and industrial news.

https://africanminingmarket.com/adtrack-delivery/26210 查看配图:LIMEC-Liberia 2026

More From AMM

    5 days ago

    BoT sells 5.1 tonnes of gold to strengthen reserves

    2 weeks ago

    Dar es Salaam cuts vessel times as Tanzania expands its role in African trade

    2 weeks ago

    Court of Appeal upholds TRA’s disallowance of depreciation on exploration expenditure

    2 weeks ago

    Tanzania paving way for nuclear energy and economic growth with revival of historic uranium project

    2 weeks ago

    Tanzania plans to intensify deep geophysical surveys to boost mining sector by 2030

    Source: African Mining Market · 矿业新闻 · africanminingmarket.com

    Licence: 负责人声明许可;来源异议或指示可逐项收紧

    The original source is traceable; the Chinese content is written or translated with AI assistance ; check the original for details.

    Something wrong? Tell us

    Event follow-ups

    See the full event

    More actions