Skip to content

AME 确认不支持不列颠哥伦比亚省矿产权咨询框架草案

AME Confirms it Does Not Endorse Mineral Claims Consultation Framework

Public on this site

AI summary

加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省矿产勘探协会(AME)确认不支持省政府提出的矿产权咨询框架(MCCF)草案,认为该草案将损害其会员及时、以商业可行方式圈定矿产权的权利。该草案定于2025年3月26日实施,AME 将在未来数周继续与省政府协商,寻求修订以确保流程公平、保护知识产权且成本可控。

Text · original

The Chinese translation is being made; the original is shown for now.

Vancouver, B.C, – February 10, 2025 – The Association for Mineral Exploration (AME) has confirmed it does not endorse the current draft Mineral Claims Consultation Framework (MCCF) that has been proposed by the provincial government.

After listening to members and advocating to government for many months, AME believes that the draft MCCF, which is due to be implemented by March 26, 2025, will negatively impact AME members’ ability to stake mineral claims in a timely and commercially viable manner.

Over the coming weeks, AME will continue to work with the province to seek amendments to the draft MCCF to ensure a process that treats everyone involved in the process fairly, protects their intellectual property, and is not cost prohibitive.

About AME

AME is the lead association for the mineral exploration and development industry based in British Columbia. Established in 1912, AME represents, advocates and promotes the interests of more than 5,000 members who are engaged in mineral exploration and development in BC and globally. AME encourages a safe, economically strong and environmentally responsible industry by providing clear initiatives, policies, events and tools to support its membership in delivering responsible projects that advance reconciliation and provide benefit to all British Columbians.

AME Contact:

Candice Appleby
Director, Communications & Strategic Projects
Association for Mineral Exploration
604.354.5877
cappleby@amebc.ca 

Source: Association for Mineral Exploration · 官方动态 · ame.ca

Licence: 负责人声明许可;来源异议或指示可逐项收紧

The original source is traceable; the Chinese content is written or translated with AI assistance ; check the original for details.

Something wrong? Tell us

More actions